Verification
Can you trust WORX?
A question about the paperwork, not the machines. We checked every figure WORX publishes against its own documentation. 1 figure did not hold up.
What we found wrong
Listed at 0.37 acres (1,500 sq m) elsewhere. WORX publishes 1 acre for the US WR340.
Cause The 1,500 sq m figure belongs to the European Landroid Vision line, where WR2xxE part numbers encode square metres. The US WR3xx Cloud line does not use that convention.
Source: worx.com product page and full robotic mower catalogue, corroborated by three retailers
What this does not tell you
Whether a WORX lasts. We have not tested these machines and this is a specification database, not a review site — so nothing here speaks to build quality, app reliability or what happens in year three. What it does say is whether the numbers WORX prints on the box survive being checked.
Straight answers
- Are WORX's published specifications accurate?
- We found published figures that were wrong and corrected them against the manufacturer's own documentation. Of 2 WORX machines, 2 carry specifications confirmed by the manufacturer plus at least one independent source, and 1 carried a figure that was wrong in general circulation.
- Which WORX specs are wrong elsewhere?
- The Landroid Vision WR340 is widely listed at 0.37 acres but is actually 1.
- Is WORX worth buying?
- We do not publish reliability opinions — we have not tested these machines. On paper, WORX covers 0.5–1 acres and 30% grade.
Check another maker
The WORX range → · Every spec we found wrong → · How we verify →